From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Widlund v. US Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
May 14, 2012
Civil No. 11-cv-371-JL (D.N.H. May. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-cv-371-JL

05-14-2012

Stacey Widlund v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner


ORDER

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated April 16, 2012, no objection having been filed. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.''' School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

Chief Judge

cc: Elizabeth R. Jones, Esq.

T. David Plourde, AUSA


Summaries of

Widlund v. US Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
May 14, 2012
Civil No. 11-cv-371-JL (D.N.H. May. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Widlund v. US Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:Stacey Widlund v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: May 14, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-cv-371-JL (D.N.H. May. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

Duguay v. U.S. Soc. Sec. Admin.

The ALJ was required to give "'controlling weight' to [this] opinion [if it] 'is well-supported by medically…