From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitson v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 9, 1935
43 P.2d 73 (Okla. 1935)

Opinion

No. 24832.

March 5, 1935. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1935.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Dismissal Where Appeal Without Merit.

Where, from an examination of the petition in error, the brief and the proceedings filed in this court, it appears that the appeal is without merit the same will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Garvin County; W.G. Long, Judge.

Proceedings by Carl Whitson against W. R. Bell et al. for injunction against the enforcement of an ordinance. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Dismissed.

Ben Goff, for plaintiff in error.

J. Harry Johnson and Harold Freeman, for defendants in error.


This action was commenced by the plaintiff below, plaintiff in error herein, to obtain an injunction against the enforcement of a certain ordinance of the city of Pauls Valley relative to the running of a pool hall.

Brief was filed herein October 24, 1934, and upon an examination of the authorities cited therein it appears that not a single case sustains remotely the proposition urged by the plaintiff In error, and of the three authorities cited none of them deal with the proposition urged in the appeal at all.

This court has held that where, from an examination of the proceedings, the petition in error, and the brief filed, it appears that the appeal is manifestly without merit, the appeal will be dismissed, and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Whitson v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Apr 9, 1935
43 P.2d 73 (Okla. 1935)
Case details for

Whitson v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:WHITSON v. BELL et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 9, 1935

Citations

43 P.2d 73 (Okla. 1935)
43 P.2d 73

Citing Cases

Tulsa Defense Houses v. Copeland

We have held that the date of the filing of the petition is controlling as to the taxable status of the…