From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whiting v. Chesebro-Whitman Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1942
264 App. Div. 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

July 1, 1942.

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ.


Defendant is a manufacturer of ladders. On September 6, 1940, it shipped to one of its distributors a "Monarch" wooden extension ladder consisting of two separate sections of sixteen feet each. On October 18, 1940, Anthony Grablick, a roofing contractor, purchased this ladder from the distributor. In November, 1940, Grablick contracted to construct a roof on a barn. Plaintiff, a roofer by trade, was employed by Grablick in the construction. On December 19, 1940, while plaintiff was ascending the ladder and carrying shingles weighing sixty-nine pounds the lower section broke and precipitated plaintiff to the ground, as a result of which he sustained serious injuries. Plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages on the theory that it was guilty of negligence in manufacturing this ladder out of decayed material. The only questions involved in this case are whether or not decay was present in the ladder when it left defendant's factory and whether or not it should have been discovered by proper inspection. Defendant concedes that the evidence is sufficient to establish that decay was present when the ladder broke. An expert witness for plaintiff testified that decay was present in the lumber at the time the ladder was fabricated and that the evidence of decay was discoverable by reasonable inspection. The evidence sustains the verdict of the jury. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Whiting v. Chesebro-Whitman Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1942
264 App. Div. 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Whiting v. Chesebro-Whitman Company

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD WHITING, Respondent, v. CHESEBRO-WHITMAN COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1942

Citations

264 App. Div. 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Kross v. Kelsey Hayes Company

There was a duty on the defendant to use reasonable care in the manufacture of the pliers. Reasonable care…