From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitehead v. Dist. Attorney Columbia Cty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2001
289 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

88332

December 13, 2001.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered October 17, 2000 in Greene County, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel respondent to return a certain motor vehicle seized by the State Police and for respondent to pay towing and storage charges.

Donohue, Sabo, Varley Armstrong P.C. (Kathleen L. Werther of counsel), Albany, for appellant.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and, Mugglin, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Petitioner owns an automobile which was seized in October 1999 in connection with an attempted murder investigation in Columbia County. At issue on appeal is a judgment of Supreme Court ( 186 Misc.2d 372) which ordered respondent to return this vehicle to petitioner, primarily because the indictment pertaining to that investigation (three counts of assault in the second degree) had been dismissed by County Court. Finding, as we do, that Supreme Court erred in granting the petition, we now reverse.

As of the commencement of this proceeding, the criminal matter in which the vehicle had been seized had not yet terminated, even though the indictment had been dismissed (see, Matter of De Bellis v. Property Clerk of City of N.Y., 79 N.Y.2d 49, 56). Indeed, this Court reinstated the indictment on appeal (see, People v. Gray, 284 A.D.2d 664). Since that criminal proceeding is extant and petitioner's automobile is potential evidence in the trial of that matter, Supreme Court erred in granting the petition (see, Matter of Marra v. Hynes, 221 A.D.2d 539; see generally,Meegan v. Tracy, 220 App. Div. 600; 23 N.Y. Jur 2d, Conversion, and Action for Recovery of Chattel, § 104, at 422-425).

In light of this determination, we need not address respondent's remaining contention in support of reversal.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Whitehead v. Dist. Attorney Columbia Cty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 2001
289 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Whitehead v. Dist. Attorney Columbia Cty

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RENEE WHITEHEAD, Respondent, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 13, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 430

Citing Cases

Hci Distribution, Inc. v. N.Y. State Police

In this regard, the possibility that criminal proceedings—in which the seizure could be challenged—would be…

Best Sound Sec. v. N.Y. City Police Dept

The criminal proceeding had not terminated at the time of the hearing. Thus, the defendants were entitled to…