From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. White

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 30, 1970
265 N.E.2d 919 (Mass. 1970)

Opinion

December 30, 1970.

Bruce G. Brown for Merit P. White.

Kenneth B. Bowen for Irene S. White.


White in 1965 obtained a divorce from Mrs. White and promptly remarried. In 1964, he entered into a stipulation for the support of their minor children. In 1967 Mrs. White lost a well compensated position because her corporate employer moved to New Jersey and she reasonably wished to remain in Massachusetts. She is now much less well paid in another position. On January 21, 1969, the probate judge on her petition increased the allowance for the two children then still minors, by a decree later properly modified to correct an inadvertent error. The evidence is not before us but the material facts reported by the probate judge fully justify his conclusions, including his decision concerning the payments necessary to keep the children in a private school, which both parents wished them to attend. See Jasper v. Jasper, 333 Mass. 223, 227. White's appeal from the modification decree is without merit and frivolous. Costs and expenses in this court and the Probate Court are to be allowed in the discretion of that court, but Mrs. White, in any event, is to have double costs of appeal. See Wilde v. Wilde, 353 Mass. 750.

Decree affirmed.


Summaries of

White v. White

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 30, 1970
265 N.E.2d 919 (Mass. 1970)
Case details for

White v. White

Case Details

Full title:MERIT P. WHITE vs. IRENE S. WHITE

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Dec 30, 1970

Citations

265 N.E.2d 919 (Mass. 1970)
265 N.E.2d 919

Citing Cases

Heistand v. Heistand

The judge correctly found no basis in either statute for awarding fees and costs. Compare White v. White, 358…