From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Patton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Aug 14, 2015
No. CIV-15-170-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 14, 2015)

Opinion

No. CIV-15-170-C

08-14-2015

KEENAN DEON WHITE, Petitioner, v. ROBERT PATTON, Director, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on June 22, 2015, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

In his Objection, Petitioner merely reargues the merits of his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel; he never even addresses the issue of timeliness. The Court finds the factual and legal conclusions recommended by the Magistrate Judge are in all respects correct.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, this petition for habeas corpus relief is dismissed as untimely. As no amendment can cure the defect, this dismissal acts as an adjudication on the merits, and a judgment will enter.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2015.

/s/_________

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

White v. Patton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Aug 14, 2015
No. CIV-15-170-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 14, 2015)
Case details for

White v. Patton

Case Details

Full title:KEENAN DEON WHITE, Petitioner, v. ROBERT PATTON, Director, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Aug 14, 2015

Citations

No. CIV-15-170-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 14, 2015)

Citing Cases

White v. Patton

The district court, upon a report and recommendation by a magistrate judge, concluded that Mr. White's…