From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Haider-Shah

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 17, 2008
9:05-CV-193 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 17, 2008)

Opinion

9:05-CV-193 (LEK/DEP).

July 17, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on June 25, 2008, by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 62).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Peebles's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 62) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 53) is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 39) is DISMISSED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. Haider-Shah

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jul 17, 2008
9:05-CV-193 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 17, 2008)
Case details for

White v. Haider-Shah

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WHITE, Plaintiff, v. SYED HAIDER-SHAH, M.D., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jul 17, 2008

Citations

9:05-CV-193 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Williams v. CF Medical, Inc.

When deciding whether a material issue of fact is in dispute, the court is cognizant that a fact is…

Vosburgh v. American National Red Cross

When deciding whether a material issue of fact is in dispute, the court is cognizant that a fact is…