affirming Rule 12(b) dismissal when plaintiff did not "claim that she was replaced by someone younger or otherwise discharged because of her age"
Summary of this case from Estell v. Strive, Inc.No. 96-40266.
October 7, 1997.
Appeal from R.D.Tex., 919 F.Supp. 1022.
AFFIRMED
affirming Rule 12(b) dismissal when plaintiff did not "claim that she was replaced by someone younger or otherwise discharged because of her age"
Summary of this case from Estell v. Strive, Inc.affirming motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim when plaintiff did not claim "that after being discharged, her employer replaced her with a person who is not a member of a class protected by Title VII or that others who are not members of a protected class remained in similar positions"
Summary of this case from Petty v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd.affirming motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim when plaintiff did not claim “that after being discharged, her employer replaced her with a person who is not a member of a class protected by Title VII or that others who are not members of a protected class remained in similar positions”
Summary of this case from Williams v. Recovery Sch. Dist.Full title:White v. Cooper
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date published: Oct 7, 1997
Williams's amended complaint states that he is a “Black employee” and that RSD's employment practices…
Washington v. City of GretnaA trial court can grant a new trial when a party has newly discovered evidence if such evidence would…