From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitcomb v. Todd

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 3, 2008
9:04-CV-223 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2008)

Opinion

9:04-CV-223 (LEK/DRH).

September 3, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 5, 2008, by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 73).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Homer's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 73) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt. Nos. 66-68) are GRANTED in all respects; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 36) is DISMISSED with prejudice against all Defendants; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Whitcomb v. Todd

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 3, 2008
9:04-CV-223 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Whitcomb v. Todd

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WHITCOMB, Plaintiff, v. REUEL A. TODD, Sheriff of Oswego County…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 3, 2008

Citations

9:04-CV-223 (LEK/DRH) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Rickett v. Orsino

As with any Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause claim, Plaintiff "does not claim any appreciable injury…

Maldonado v. Wells

While it is unclear whether the pain was substantial, there is little dispute that it was chronic.Whitcomb v.…