From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitaker v. Alameda Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2013
No. C 12-05923 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-05923 JSW

03-22-2013

AKIL TEVA WHITAKER and TIEGA-NOEL VARLACK, Plaintiffs, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY and RAMSEY D. JACKSON, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On February 22, 2013, Defendants County of Alameda and Ramsey Jackson filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings and set the hearing for March29, 2013. The opposition to the motion was due to be filed no later than March 8, 2013. No opposition has been filed.

The Court HEREBY ISSUES this Order to Show Cause requiring Plaintiffs Akil Teva Whitaker and Tiega-Noel Varlack to respond in writing by no later than March 29, 2013, whether they intend to oppose the outstanding motion for judgment on the pleadings. Failure to respond at that time shall result in entry of judgment in Defendants' favor.

In addition, the hearing scheduled for March 29, 2013 is HEREBY VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Whitaker v. Alameda Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 22, 2013
No. C 12-05923 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Whitaker v. Alameda Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:AKIL TEVA WHITAKER and TIEGA-NOEL VARLACK, Plaintiffs, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 22, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-05923 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)