From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whipple v. New York State & Local Ret. Sys.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 5, 2012
91 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-5

In the Matter of William A. WHIPPLE, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE AND LOCAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM et al., Respondents.

Iaconis Law Office, P.L.L.C., Chittenango (Paul F. Iaconis of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.


Iaconis Law Office, P.L.L.C., Chittenango (Paul F. Iaconis of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MERCURE, ACTING P.J., ROSE, LAHTINEN, KAVANAGH and McCARTHY, JJ.

ROSE, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner applied for accidental disability retirement benefits after he was injured at work. His application was initially denied and petitioner sought a hearing and redetermination. Petitioner sought to submit medical records in support of his claim but, as the Hearing Officer found, because he had not submitted the records to respondent New York State and Local Retirement System within the 45–day deadline set forth by the Retirement System, they could not be considered ( see 2 NYCRR 317.9[b] ). The Hearing Officer denied petitioner's application on the basis that petitioner's disability was not due to the workplace accident. Respondent Comptroller accepted the Hearing Officer's findings and conclusions, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Respondents advise this Court that the Comptroller has agreed to administratively annul the determination and return the matter to the Hearing Officer for further proceedings at which petitioner's medical records shall be admitted into evidence and considered in connection with petitioner's application. In light of the foregoing, petitioner has been provided with all the relief to which he is entitled and the petition must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Stage v. DiNapoli, 86 A.D.3d 857, 858, 926 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2011]; Matter of Neeley v. Town of Colonie, 79 A.D.3d 1560, 1561 [2010] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

MERCURE, ACTING P.J., LAHTINEN, KAVANAGH and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Whipple v. New York State & Local Ret. Sys.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 5, 2012
91 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Whipple v. New York State & Local Ret. Sys.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of William A. WHIPPLE, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE AND…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

91 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
935 N.Y.S.2d 919
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 84

Citing Cases

Robinson v. State

Respondents have advised this Court that the Comptroller has agreed to administratively annul the…

Martone v. New York State Comptroller

Respondents now concede that petitioner's injuries resulted from an accident and have informed this Court…