From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whipple v. Dawson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 14, 2021
321 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1250

07-14-2021

Juan WHIPPLE, Appellant, v. Crystal F. DAWSON, et al., Appellees.

Juan Whipple, in proper person. William C. Robinson, for appellees.


Juan Whipple, in proper person.

William C. Robinson, for appellees.

Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925, 928 (Fla. 2005) ("In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved." (quoting Tillman v. State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985) )); Rose v. Clements, 973 So. 2d 529, 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ("Any basis for reversal of summary judgment must be preserved by raising the issue in the trial court."); Rose v. Hansell, 929 So. 2d 22, 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (explaining that appellant is "required to provide an adequate record to support his appeal, and it is his burden to demonstrate error").


Summaries of

Whipple v. Dawson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 14, 2021
321 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Whipple v. Dawson

Case Details

Full title:Juan WHIPPLE, Appellant, v. Crystal F. DAWSON, et al., Appellees.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

321 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)