From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whelehan v. County of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 29, 1970
35 A.D.2d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

October 29, 1970

Appeal from the Monroe Trial Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Marsh, Gabrielli and Henry, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The charge of the court with reference to reasonable foreseeability, which the plaintiff now urges as ground for reversal, was not the subject of any exception by plaintiff following the main charge or when it was repeated at the time the jury sought additional instructions, and no request for clarification or correction was ever made. In the absence of such exception or request we do not find there was error so fundamental or so creative of confusion as to require a new trial in the interest of justice.


Summaries of

Whelehan v. County of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 29, 1970
35 A.D.2d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Whelehan v. County of Monroe

Case Details

Full title:GERALDINE WHELEHAN, as Administratrix of the Estate of BERNARD WHELEHAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1970

Citations

35 A.D.2d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Boyd v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Indeed, plaintiff never sought this relief before the jury verdict was rendered, and specifically informed…

Lee v. Quinn

As to appellant's other argument, we note that no exception or request to charge was made. The error was not…