From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheatt v. City of Cleveland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Oct 22, 2019
CASE NO. 1:17-CV-377 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 22, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-377 CASE NO. 1:17-CV-611 (consolidated)

10-22-2019

DERRICK WHEATT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, et al., Defendants.


OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 396] :

On November 15, 2018, Plaintiffs Derrick Wheatt, Laurese Glover, and Eugene Johnson won a jury verdict against Defendants Vincent Johnstone and Michael Perry. Defendant Michael Perry later died on December 9, 2018.

Doc. 359.

Doc. 393.

Plaintiffs now move to substitute Karen Perry, as Executor of Michael Perry's Estate, in place of Michael Perry. Defendant City of East Cleveland opposes; Plaintiffs reply.

Doc. 396.

Doc. 398; Doc. 401.

Doc. 399.

The Court grants Plaintiffs' motion because the requested substitution complies with the relevant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure requirements.

I. Legal Standard

If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the Court may order substitution of the proper party. After the filing and service of a death notice, any party or the decedent's successor or representative may move for substitution. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.

Id.

Rule 25(a) requires two affirmative steps to trigger the running of the 90-day deadline for the substitution motion. First, a death notice must be made upon the record. Second, the death notice must be served upon the parties, as provided in Rule 5, and upon nonparties, as provided in Rule 4.

Lawson v. Cty. of Wayne, No. 11-11163, 2012 WL 5258216, at *4-5 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 23, 2012).

Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(3); Golden Gate Nat'l Senior Care, LLC v. Slaven, No. CV 5:17-161-KKC, 2018 WL 1474072, at *4 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 26, 2018).

Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(3); Golden Gate Nat'l Senior Care, 2018 WL 1474072, at *4.

II. Analysis

Plaintiffs' motion complies with the Rule 25(a) procedural requirements. Plaintiffs filed the death notice on July 9, 2019. Plaintiffs served the notice on all Parties in accordance with Rule 5 and on nonparty Karen Perry in accordance with Rule 4. Within 90 days of filing and serving the notice, Plaintiffs moved for substitution.

Doc. 393.

See id.

Doc. 396.

Defendant East Cleveland argues that Plaintiffs' motion to substitute should be denied as untimely. It contends that the 90-day deadline commenced December 19, 2018, when East Cleveland referenced Perry's death in a court filing.

Doc. 401 (citing Doc. 374 at 2).

Defendant's argument is unpersuasive. As described above, Rule 25 gives the 90-day deadline triggering requirements. A notice must be (1) filed with the court and (2) served on all parties in accordance with Rule 5 and on all nonparties in accordance with Rule 4. Defendant's December 2018 reference to Michael Perry's death did not satisfy the service requirement and therefore did not trigger the 90-day deadline.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(3); Golden Gate Nat'l Senior Care, 2018 WL 1474072, at *4. --------

III. Order

The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion to substitute Karen Perry, as Executor of Michael Perry's Estate, as the Defendant in place of Michael Perry.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2019

s/ James S . Gwin

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wheatt v. City of Cleveland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Oct 22, 2019
CASE NO. 1:17-CV-377 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 22, 2019)
Case details for

Wheatt v. City of Cleveland

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK WHEATT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Oct 22, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-377 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 22, 2019)