From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whaley v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 23, 1944
141 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1944)

Opinion

No. 10940.

April 20, 1944. Rehearing Denied May 23, 1944.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia; Robert L. Russell, Judge.

Jake Whaley was convicted of conspiracy to violate the Internal Revenue Laws relating to moonshine liquor, and he appeals in forma pauperis.

Affirmed.

Clint W. Hager and J.F. Kemp, both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

M. Neil Andrews, U.S. Atty., Jas. T. Manning and R.W. Martin, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and WALLER, Circuit Judge.


Whether or not there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict, finding the appellant guilty of membership in a conspiracy to violate the internal revenue laws relating to moonshine liquor, depends upon the weight that is accorded a number of pertinent circumstances, none of which, standing alone, would be sufficient to sustain a conviction. It is the jury's province to determine the weight that should be given to the circumstances, singly and collectively, and to determine, under the proper instructions of the Court (as were apparently given in this case), whether or not those circumstances exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than the guilt of the defendant. The only substantial issue in this case is the question of the weight of the evidence as applied to numerous relevant and material circumstances. The jury, acting within the scope of its function and with justification, has found the defendant guilty. Its findings will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Whaley v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 23, 1944
141 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1944)
Case details for

Whaley v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WHALEY v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 23, 1944

Citations

141 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1944)

Citing Cases

Tanner v. United States

We do not sustain the appellants' contention that the evidence, "at best, tended to show a series of…

Gangl v. State

Were those requirements placed on the state for these purposes, circumstantial evidence would always be…