From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wetmore v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

March, 1927.


Order changing place of trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff brought the action in Suffolk county, where he resides. Defendant, on the ground of convenience of witnesses, moved to change the venue to Cortland county, where he resides and where the cause of action arose. In the circumstances the court had no power, of its own motion, to change the venue to Queens county, where neither party resides. ( Levey v. Payne, 200 App. Div. 30.) An analysis of the proof to be offered in this case, read with the concessions made by plaintiff, narrows the issue materially, and requires a denial of the motion to change the place of trial upon the ground of convenience of witnesses. Kelly, P.J., Young, Kapper Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wetmore v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Wetmore v. Saunders

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM W. WETMORE, Respondent, v. ARTHUR F. SAUNDERS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Henderson Baker Lbr. Co. v. Headley

This can only be reasonably interpreted as meaning a loan of money for this purpose. Expressions in Donaldson…