Opinion
11-cv-02448-EMC (NC) Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC (NC) Related cases: 11-cv-03214 EMC (NC) Related cases: 11-cv-03322 EMC (NC) Related cases: 11-cv-03668 EMC (NC))
03-07-2013
CURTIS and CHARLOTTE WESTLEY, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. OCLARO, INC., et al., Defendants. IN RE OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, This Document Relates to: Westley v. Oclaro, Inc., et al.
No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
and related consolidated action
(Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC
(NC))
(Derivative Action)
ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER
Re: Dkt. No. 114
(Derivative Action)
This case was referred to this Court for all discovery purposes including the joint letter dated February 20, 2013, Dkt. No. 114. See Dkt. No. 119. The joint letter seeks guidance on the appropriate scope of discovery in connection with discovery propounded by Lead Plaintiff. The Court is not satisfied that the parties have fully met and conferred to resolve their dispute. Accordingly, counsel for the parties are ordered to meet and confer with each other in person or by telephone. See Mag. Judge N. Cousins, Civil Standing Order, updated Aug. 24, 2012. If the conference fails to resolve the dispute, the parties may file a joint letter brief, in accordance with my standing discovery order, by March 15. At that time, the Court will set a telephonic conference, or a hearing, if necessary.
Docket entry No. 114 is ordered denied without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge