From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westinghouse El. Mfg. v. Brooklyn Rap. T

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 6, 1927
20 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1927)

Opinion

No. 86.

June 6, 1927.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

An order was entered on the mandate of this court on a former appeal (6 F.[2d] 547), which modified a decree of the District Court. Lindley M. Garrison, receiver of the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, appeals. Affirmed.

See, also, 288 F. 221; 291 F. 836, 863.

George N. Hamlin and Harold G. Pickering, both of New York City, for appellant.

Cullen Dykman, of Brooklyn, N.Y. (William N. Dykman and Sigourney B. Olney, both of Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.


The order entered is affirmed. By this affirmance we express no opinion as to the matters discussed in the opinion below concerning the issues involved in the ancillary suit there referred to.

Order (20 F.[2d] 932) affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Westinghouse El. Mfg. v. Brooklyn Rap. T

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 6, 1927
20 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1927)
Case details for

Westinghouse El. Mfg. v. Brooklyn Rap. T

Case Details

Full title:WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BROOKLYN RAPID…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 6, 1927

Citations

20 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1927)

Citing Cases

Westinghouse El. Mfg. v. Brooklyn Rap. T.

On motion on behalf of the Brooklyn City Railroad Company for order or decree pursuant to mandate of the…