Opinion
Submitted October 25, 1935 —
Decided January 31, 1936.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 115 N.J.L. 86.
For the appellant, Martin P. O'Connor.
For the respondents, William A. Lord, Jr.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.