From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westcott v. Urban Holding Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1950
277 App. Div. 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

October 16, 1950.

Appeal from County Court, Westchester County.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.


No objection was made in the County Court, or on this appeal, that separate judgments had been entered by defendants, and plaintiff made no motion in the County Court to retax costs pursuant to the provisions of section 1535 or section 1536 of the Civil Practice Act. Judgments unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents-appellants. In our opinion the County Judge correctly decided that plaintiff, who had rented the occupied premises, which included garages and a parking lot, as well as residential space, for the purpose of conducting a rooming house and renting the garages and parking space as a business venture, was not entitled to recover under the statute, which was designed to protect occupants of housing accommodations rented for living or dwelling purposes and not for the conduct of a business venture. (Cf. Belenky v. Colombo, 275 App. Div. 99.) Order appealed from reversed on the law, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. The procedure adopted by plaintiff with respect to the costs taxed was without authority, as was the order appealed from, which purported to direct the clerk to "retax" the judgments. Plaintiff's remedy, under the circumstances disclosed by the record, was to move to retax costs pursuant to section 1535 or section 1536 of the Civil Practice Act. ( Leonard v. Columbia Steam Navigation Co., 84 N.Y. 48; Empire Produce Co. v. Allen, 130 Misc. 155.)


Summaries of

Westcott v. Urban Holding Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1950
277 App. Div. 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Westcott v. Urban Holding Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GRACE M. WESTCOTT, Appellant-Respondent, v. URBAN HOLDING CO., INC. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 999 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Benenson v. Ritzmann

The fact that in 1945 the managing agent of the property sent the defendants communications and bills for…

Benenson v. Ritzmann

The clear unambiguous language of these leases is not susceptible to such casual and incidental practical…