From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westchester Religious Institute v. Kamerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1998
248 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 3, 1998

Appeal from the Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.).


There has been no showing that defendants were prejudiced by or changed their position in any way due to plaintiff's delay in bringing suit. Nor is there any indication that plaintiff's reluctance to resort to litigation to resolve this internecine dispute was unreasonable under the circumstances. For these reasons, and particularly inasmuch as this is an action for an accounting brought against a fiduciary ( see, Matter of Barabash, 31 N.Y.2d 76, 82), the IAS Court's dismissal of the complaint based on laches was error ( see, Dwyer v. Mazzola, 171 A.D.2d 726).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Westchester Religious Institute v. Kamerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1998
248 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Westchester Religious Institute v. Kamerman

Case Details

Full title:WESTCHESTER RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE, Appellant, v. JEROME KAMERMAN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 116 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 805

Citing Cases

Scotto v. Landesman

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.). We perceive no basis for overturning…

Ametek, Inc. v. Goldfarb

II. The Defendants' counterclaim for reformation (second counterclaim) is not dismissed The doctrine of…