Opinion
2017–12612 Docket No. B–4577–16
03-20-2019
In the MATTER OF Spiritual A.A.M. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent; v. Luz A. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant; Miguel M. (Anonymous), nonparty-appellant.
Deborah D. Clegg, New Rochelle, NY, for respondent-appellant. Lisa F. Colin, White Plains, NY, for nonparty-appellant. John M. Nonna, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Linda Trentacoste and Justin R. Adin of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Karen M. Jansen, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.
Deborah D. Clegg, New Rochelle, NY, for respondent-appellant.
Lisa F. Colin, White Plains, NY, for nonparty-appellant.
John M. Nonna, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Linda Trentacoste and Justin R. Adin of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.
Karen M. Jansen, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, ROBERT J. MILLER, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b, inter alia, to terminate the mother's parental rights to the subject child on the ground of permanent neglect. The nonparty father was deemed a notice father pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111–a. The Family Court found, after a fact-finding hearing, that the mother permanently neglected the child, and, after a dispositional hearing, terminated the mother's parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to the petitioner for the purpose of adoption. The mother and the father separately appeal.
The petitioner met its initial burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that it exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship between the mother and the child by, among other things, developing an appropriate service plan, scheduling regular parental access between the mother and the child, and referring the mother to a parenting skills program (see Social Services Law § 384–b[7][a] ; Matter of Hailey ZZ. [Ricky ZZ.], 19 N.Y.3d 422, 430, 948 N.Y.S.2d 846, 972 N.E.2d 87 ; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 384–385, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 ; Matter of Yamira Empress S. [Yvonne M.S.], 155 A.D.3d 961, 962, 65 N.Y.S.3d 235 ; Matter of Elias P. [Ferman P.], 145 A.D.3d 1066, 1068, 44 N.Y.S.3d 516 ). The record shows that, despite the petitioner's diligent efforts, the mother failed to plan for the return of the child as, inter alia, her participation in the parenting skills program was inconsistent, she failed to gain insight as to the need for services and the reasons for the child's placement in the first instance, she was less than forthcoming with the petitioner and service providers with respect to pertinent circumstances related to herself and the father, together with whom she had planned for the return of the child, and she engaged in disturbing behavior during supervised visits with the child (see Matter of Joshua E.R. [Yolaine R.], 123 A.D.3d 723, 726, 997 N.Y.S.2d 739 ; see also Matter of Isaiah Jaysean J. [Cierra Tassandra J.], 128 A.D.3d 438, 438–439, 8 N.Y.S.3d 325 ).
We agree with the Family Court's determination that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the best interests of the child (see Matter of Jasiah T.-V. S.J., 166 A.D.3d 876, 89 N.Y.S.3d 192 ; Matter of Tymel P. [Tyrone P.], 157 A.D.3d 699, 700, 69 N.Y.S.3d 92 ; Matter of Jeremy D.R., 40 A.D.3d 764, 765, 836 N.Y.S.2d 626 ; Matter of Ashey Lorraine R., 22 A.D.3d 671, 672, 804 N.Y.S.2d 348 ).
The mother's and the father's remaining contentions are without merit.
MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.