From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jul 11, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-04241 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 11, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-04241

07-11-2018

JASON HAYNES WEST, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On October 30, 2017, the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint (Document 1) in this matter. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 17) was filed on February 8, 2018.

By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on October 31, 2017, this action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 13, 2018, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 32) wherein it is recommended that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 17) be granted, and that this matter be removed from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by July 2, 2018.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 17) be GRANTED, and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: July 11, 2018

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

West v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jul 11, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-04241 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 11, 2018)
Case details for

West v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JASON HAYNES WEST, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Jul 11, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-cv-04241 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 11, 2018)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. United States

on of employees usually involve policy judgments of the type Congress intended the discretionary function…

Greene v. United States

Cf. Santana-Rosa v. United States, 335 F.3d 39, 43 (1st Cir. 2003) (holding that negligent assignment claim…