From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. Foster

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 21, 2010
2:10-CV-02086-JCM-RJJ (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2010)

Opinion

2:10-CV-02086-JCM-RJJ.

December 21, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner Merry West has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Based on the current information about petitioner's financial status, including any additional information she may have provided, the court finds that she is able to pay the full fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without having to prepay the full filing fee (docket #1) is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date this order is ENTERED in which to have the designated fee sent to the clerk. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The clerk is directed to RETAIN the complaint but not file it at this time.

Dated this 21 day of December 2010.


Summaries of

West v. Foster

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 21, 2010
2:10-CV-02086-JCM-RJJ (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2010)
Case details for

West v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:MERRY WEST, Petitioner, v. SHERYL FOSTER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 21, 2010

Citations

2:10-CV-02086-JCM-RJJ (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2010)

Citing Cases

Ruelas v. Muniz

Finally, the Court would note that the deadline for petitioner to file a notice of appeal was not tolled by…

Dothard v. Maclaren

Lawson v. Smith, No. 14-10499, 2014 WL 6686772, at *6 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 26, 2014) ("A traverse or reply to an…