From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. Arbogast

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 6, 2010
09-CV-3792 (RRM) (RML) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2010)

Opinion

09-CV-3792 (RRM) (RML).

December 6, 2010


ORDER


By order dated February 2, 2010, this Court referred all issues concerning service of process to the assigned Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation. On November 5, 2010, Magistrate Judge Levy issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R R") recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint for Plaintiff's failure to affect timely service of process as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure be granted and that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Judge Levy reminded the parties that, pursuant to Rule 72(b), any objection to the R R was due November 19, 2010. No party has filed any objection.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R R for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the R R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' motion is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

December 6, 2010


Summaries of

West v. Arbogast

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 6, 2010
09-CV-3792 (RRM) (RML) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2010)
Case details for

West v. Arbogast

Case Details

Full title:SHONDELLE WEST, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ARBOGAST and SONIA F. ELLIOTT…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Dec 6, 2010

Citations

09-CV-3792 (RRM) (RML) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States ex rel. Bilotta v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss Relator's kickback claims under the federal False Claims Act will…

Green v. Unwin

Under such circumstances, the plaintiff's pro se status cannot, by itself, provide good cause to excuse his…