Opinion
Argued February 5, 1936 —
Decided May 14, 1936.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 115 N.J.L. 396.
For the appellants, Samuel D. Williams.
For the respondent, Edward P. Stout.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 8.
For reversal — CASE, BODINE, JJ. 2.