From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West 148 LLC v. Yonke

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department
Feb 8, 2006
11 Misc. 3d 40 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Opinion

570372/04.

February 8, 2006.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie L. Lau, J.), entered May 10, 2004. The judgment awarded petitioner possession of the subject rent-stabilized apartment in a holdover summary proceeding after a nonjury trial.

Paule-Sylvie Yonke, appellant pro se.

Rappaport, Hertz, Cherson Rosenthal, P.C., Forest Hills ( David I. Paul of counsel), for respondent.

SUAREZ, P.J., DAVIS and SCHOENFELD, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Final judgment entered May 10, 2004 affirmed, without costs.

The trial evidence shows, and it is not seriously disputed, that tenant rented a portion of the stabilized apartment to a series of guests or "roommates"; that tenant charged each of the roommates nearly double the monthly stabilized rent, collecting what the trial court aptly described as a "lucrative windfall"; and that tenant herself described the apartment, in both an Internet listing for "Affordable Hotels" and on her business card, as the "Chez Sylvie Bed and Breakfast." On these facts, the trial court correctly concluded that the tenant's commercial exploitation of her stabilized apartment required eviction pursuant to Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2525.7 ( see Ram 1 LLC v. Mazzola, 2001 NY Slip Op 50073[U] [2001], lv denied 2002 NY App Div LEXIS 6531; see also BLF Realty Holding Corp. v. Kasher, 299 AD2d 87, lv dismissed 100 NY2d 535; compare 54 Greene St. Realty Corp. v. Shook, 8 AD3d 168).


Summaries of

West 148 LLC v. Yonke

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department
Feb 8, 2006
11 Misc. 3d 40 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
Case details for

West 148 LLC v. Yonke

Case Details

Full title:WEST 148 LLC, Respondent, v. PAULE-SYLVIE YONKE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York. First Department

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

11 Misc. 3d 40 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 26038
812 N.Y.S.2d 735

Citing Cases

Hudson v. Seaborn

Appellate Term for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts has subsequently noted that "DHCR [the agency…

Goldstein v. Lipetz

Most of defendant's "guests" stayed for less than a week. Only one of them stayed for more than 11 days. The…