From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wesley v. Kuteman

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
May 2, 1901
62 S.W. 1074 (Tex. Civ. App. 1901)

Opinion

Decided May 2, 1901.

1. — Appeal — Notice.

That plaintiff below gave notice of appeal will not inure to the benefit of the defendant so as to entitle him, plaintiff having failed to perfect an appeal, to prosecute an appeal without notice given and have the clerk file the transcript in the appellate court.

2. — Same — Affidavit in Lieu of Appeal Bond — Certainty.

The same certainty is required of an affidavit of inability to give an appeal bond as is required of such a bond, and the affidavit is insufficient where it fails to give the date of the judgment, the nature thereof and in whose favor rendered.

Original motion to file transcript.

M.D. Carlock, for motion.


This is a motion by appellants to require the clerk to file the transcript in this case. The transcript tendered for filing shows that this suit was brought by appellee, R.B. Kuteman, to recover title to land against a number of defendants, among whom were the appellants. A trial resulted in a judgment for plaintiff as against appellants, and in favor of the other defendants. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, upon the overruling of which he gave notice of appeal, which was entered of record. No further effort was made by plaintiff to perfect his appeal. The appellants gave no notice of appeal, but within twenty days after the overruling of plaintiff's motion for new trial, they filed and affidavit of inability to give bond, in lieu of an appeal bond. It is essential to the right of appeal that the "appellant" give notice of appeal in open court. Rev. Stats., art. 1387. The appellants herein did not give notice of an appeal, but insist that the notice given by plaintiff, appellee here, inured to their benefit. In this we do not concur.

The affidavit in lieu of an appeal bond filed by appellants fails to identify the judgment with sufficient certainty. It fails to give the date of the judgment, the nature thereof, and in whose favor rendered. The same certainty is required as in an appeal bond. Perry v. Scott, 68 Tex. 208; Holmes v. McIntyre, 61 Tex. 9.

The motion is refused.

Motion overruled.


Summaries of

Wesley v. Kuteman

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
May 2, 1901
62 S.W. 1074 (Tex. Civ. App. 1901)
Case details for

Wesley v. Kuteman

Case Details

Full title:JOE AND WILLIAM WESLEY v. R.B. KUTEMAN

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 2, 1901

Citations

62 S.W. 1074 (Tex. Civ. App. 1901)
62 S.W. 1074

Citing Cases

St. Louis, B. M. Ry. v. Stafford

It is true in this instance, as appellant in argument urges, that the statute was in force at the time the…

Golden W. Oil Co. v. Golden Rod Oil Co.

Without a notice of appeal actually given in open court, the appellate court cannot acquire jurisdiction of…