From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wenzel v. Zantop Air Transport, Inc.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 19, 1967
97 N.J. Super. 264 (App. Div. 1967)

Summary

explaining that an employee's in-state domicile alone, without any employment contacts, is insufficient to confer jurisdiction in New Jersey

Summary of this case from Anesthesia Assocs. of Morristown v. Weinstein Supply Corp.

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1967 —

Decided October 19, 1967.

On appeal from the Union County Court, Law Division.

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

Mr. John W. Devlin argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. O'Brien, Devlin Shaw, attorneys).

Mr. Andrew Lawrie argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Lawrie and Jennings, attorneys).


The judgment dismissing petitioner's claim for workmen's compensation benefits for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Weidenburner in his opinion reported at 94 N.J. Super. 326 ( Cty. Ct. 1967).


Summaries of

Wenzel v. Zantop Air Transport, Inc.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 19, 1967
97 N.J. Super. 264 (App. Div. 1967)

explaining that an employee's in-state domicile alone, without any employment contacts, is insufficient to confer jurisdiction in New Jersey

Summary of this case from Anesthesia Assocs. of Morristown v. Weinstein Supply Corp.
Case details for

Wenzel v. Zantop Air Transport, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE R. WENZEL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ZANTOP AIR TRANSPORT, INC.…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 19, 1967

Citations

97 N.J. Super. 264 (App. Div. 1967)
235 A.2d 29

Citing Cases

Williams v. Port Authority

So long as a state has more than a "casual" connection to the employment, it may apply its compensation law…

Williams v. a L Packing Storage

Since Cramer, we have on several occasions held that a pending workers' compensation proceeding or award in…