From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wensley v. Randolph

New York Common Pleas — Additional General Term
Aug 1, 1894
9 Misc. 457 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)

Opinion

August, 1894.

Wensley Gilroy, for appellant.

Harrison Byrd, for defendant.


The power of this court to entertain appeals from District Courts is purely statutory. No authority for entertaining an appeal from an interlocutory order has been brought to our attention. Our jurisdiction is limited to appeals from judgments and final orders in summary proceedings. See Jacobs v. Zeltner, handed down herewith.

This appeal must, therefore, be dismissed, with costs to respondent.

Present: BOOKSTAVER and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.


Summaries of

Wensley v. Randolph

New York Common Pleas — Additional General Term
Aug 1, 1894
9 Misc. 457 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)
Case details for

Wensley v. Randolph

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE W. WENSLEY, Appellant, v . WILTON RANDOLPH, Respondent

Court:New York Common Pleas — Additional General Term

Date published: Aug 1, 1894

Citations

9 Misc. 457 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)
30 N.Y.S. 239

Citing Cases

Pascocello v. Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.

It is provided by section 1367 of the charter, creating those courts, that: "An appeal from a judgment…