Opinion
May, 1923.
Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, on the ground that this action was not obviously within the definition a difficult and extraordinary one, and that within the rule prevailing within this department an additional allowance was improperly granted to the plaintiff. ( Swan v. Stiles, 94 App. Div. 117; Frey v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co., 114 id. 623; Cooper v. N.Y., L. W.R. Co., Nos. 1 2, 122 id. 128; Bradshaw v. City of James own, 125 id. 86.) All concur.