Summary
allowing employee to contest poor evaluation using testimony of co-workers
Summary of this case from Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Ref. Corp.Opinion
No. 91-426.
November 4, 1991.
C.A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 936 F. 2d 358.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Weltman v. Silna
U.S.
Nov 4, 1991
502 U.S. 941 (1991)
Summaries of
Weltman v. Silna
U.S.
Nov 4, 1991
502 U.S. 941 (1991)
allowing employee to contest poor evaluation using testimony of co-workers
Summary of this case from Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Ref. Corp.explaining that the factors of judicial economy, convenience, fairness and comity tilt towards remand when a federal court dismisses federal claims before trial
Summary of this case from McConnell v. ABC-Amega, Inc.stating no need to defer to EEOC, although court "appreciate[d]" having agency's view
Summary of this case from Cuddyer v. the Stop Shop Supermarket Co.Case details for
Weltman v. Silna
Case Details
Full title:WELTMAN v. SILNA ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 4, 1991
Citations
502 U.S. 941 (1991)
Citing Cases
Smith v. Milwaukee County
Eleventh Amendment issues arise whenever a private citizen files a federal lawsuit against a state, a state…
Serbalik v. GrayThe federal claims against the Grays having been dismissed, the Court declines to exercise supplemental…