From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank v. Andalex Aviation Il, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 4, 2019
173 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9531N Index 651415/16

06-04-2019

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. ANDALEX AVIATION II, LLC, et al., Defendants. Eleonora Silverman, Nonparty, Appellant.

Law Offices of Craig Avedisian, P.C., New York (Craig Avedisian of counsel), for appellant. Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP, New York (David S.S. Hamilton of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of Craig Avedisian, P.C., New York (Craig Avedisian of counsel), for appellant.

Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP, New York (David S.S. Hamilton of counsel), for respondent.

Acosta, J.P., Richter, Kapnick, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2018, denying appellant's motion for a protective order and to quash a subpoena ad testificandum, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court correctly denied the motion to quash the deposition subpoena, served pursuant to CPLR 6220, as movant failed to carry her prima facie burden of showing that the discovery sought was irrelevant or that it was obvious that "the process [would] not lead to legitimate discovery" ( Liberty Petroleum Realty, LLC v. Gulf Oil, L.P., 164 A.D.3d 401, 403 [1st Dept. 2018] ). Moreover, service at movant's usual place of abode within the state of New York was sufficient to comply with CPLR 308(4) (see Feinstein v. Bergner, 48 N.Y.2d 234, 239, 422 N.Y.S.2d 356, 397 N.E.2d 1161 [1979] ).

We have considered appellant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank v. Andalex Aviation Il, LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 4, 2019
173 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank v. Andalex Aviation Il, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Wells Fargo Bank National Association, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 4, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
99 N.Y.S.3d 625
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 4338

Citing Cases

Mori v. Riomar Corp.

Regarding defendants' contentions, "[a]n application to quash a subpoena should be granted only where the…

Evans v. Punter

Relevancy "An application to quash a subpoena should be granted only where the futility of the process to…