From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 21, 2017
156 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

5268N Index 382162/09

12-21-2017

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Mohamed CISSE, Defendant–Appellant, Bronx Supreme Court, et al., Defendants.

Mohamed Cisse, appellant pro se. Reed Smith LLP, New York (Kerren B. Zinner of counsel), for respondent.


Mohamed Cisse, appellant pro se.

Reed Smith LLP, New York (Kerren B. Zinner of counsel), for respondent.

Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered November 13, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for an order of reference and a default judgment against defendant Cisse, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is unnecessary to consider whether defendant demonstrated a meritorious defense to this foreclosure action, because he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse, or indeed any excuse, for his failure to answer the complaint or otherwise timely appear in this action, which was commenced in 2009 (see Mutual Mar. Off., Inc. v. Joy Constr. Corp., 39 A.D.3d 417, 419, 835 N.Y.S.2d 88 [1st Dept. 2007] ; see also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mazzara, 124 A.D.3d 875, 2 N.Y.S.3d 553 [2d Dept.2015] ).


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 21, 2017
156 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Mohamed CISSE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 21, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 8894
65 N.Y.S.3d 689

Citing Cases

Huiping Dong v. Tina Yu Howe

As defendant failed to show a reasonable excuse for her default, it was not necessary for the court to…