From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Welch v. Holder

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Dec 14, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 09-0534-WS-C (S.D. Ala. Dec. 14, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 09-0534-WS-C.

December 14, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Welch v. Holder

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Dec 14, 2009
CIVIL ACTION 09-0534-WS-C (S.D. Ala. Dec. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Welch v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:ELMORE S. WELCH, JR., Plaintiff, v. ERIC HOLDER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 14, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 09-0534-WS-C (S.D. Ala. Dec. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

Palmdale v. Cal. High-Speed Rail Auth.

Furthermore, Rule 8(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that a complaint must contain a…

Crown Nursery, LLC v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp.

Furthermore, Rule 8(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that a complaint must contain a…