From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weiss v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 31, 2009
1:07-CV-1039 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2009)

Summary

approving magistrate judge's opinion that a non-examining State-agency analyst opinion "cannot be considered substantial evidence sufficient to support the [hearing officer]'s determination" where the analyst's findings that claimant can sit for six hours a day "were not supported by any citation to the medical records and are directly contradicted by the assessment of Plaintiff's treating physician" (citing Griffith v. Astrue, No. 08-CV-6004, 2009 WL 909630, at *9 (W.D.N.Y. July 27, 2009) (Siragusa, J.) ("The State Agency Officials' reports, which are conclusory, stale, and based on an incomplete medical record, are not substantial evidence"))

Summary of this case from Beylo v. Astrue

Opinion

1:07-CV-1039 (LEK/VEB).

August 31, 2009


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 12, 2009, by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 16).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Bianchini's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 16) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and that the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Weiss v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 31, 2009
1:07-CV-1039 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2009)

approving magistrate judge's opinion that a non-examining State-agency analyst opinion "cannot be considered substantial evidence sufficient to support the [hearing officer]'s determination" where the analyst's findings that claimant can sit for six hours a day "were not supported by any citation to the medical records and are directly contradicted by the assessment of Plaintiff's treating physician" (citing Griffith v. Astrue, No. 08-CV-6004, 2009 WL 909630, at *9 (W.D.N.Y. July 27, 2009) (Siragusa, J.) ("The State Agency Officials' reports, which are conclusory, stale, and based on an incomplete medical record, are not substantial evidence"))

Summary of this case from Beylo v. Astrue
Case details for

Weiss v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ALICIA WEISS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Aug 31, 2009

Citations

1:07-CV-1039 (LEK/VEB) (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2009)

Citing Cases

Butler v. Astrue

Based on the scant medical evidence, the hearing officer could not, and in fact did not, make a determination…

Beylo v. Astrue

Therefore, the analyst's assessment is not sufficient evidence to support the hearing officer's…