From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weisberg v. Town of Wallkill Boys & Girls Club, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 11, 2015
126 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

03-11-2015

Janine L. WEISBERG, appellant, v. TOWN OF WALLKILL BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB, INC., respondent.

Philip J. Dinhofer, LLC, Rockville Centre, N.Y., for appellant. Steven F. Goldstein, LLP, Carle Place, N.Y., for respondent.


Philip J. Dinhofer, LLC, Rockville Centre, N.Y., for appellant.

Steven F. Goldstein, LLP, Carle Place, N.Y., for respondent.

Opinion In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Marx, J.), dated January 7, 2013, as granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained when she slipped on dirt and rocks in an unpaved area of a park in which she was walking. In the order appealed from, the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was granted.

The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint by demonstrating that the condition upon which the plaintiff slipped was a “naturally occurring topographic condition,” inherent in the nature of the property, that the defendant “could not reasonably be expected to remedy” (Demuth v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., 85 A.D.3d 713, 714, 924 N.Y.S.2d 826 ; cf. Badalbaeva v. City of New York, 55 A.D.3d 764, 866 N.Y.S.2d 322 ; Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay, 40 A.D.3d 612, 835 N.Y.S.2d 406 ; Torres v. State of New York, 18 A.D.3d 739, 795 N.Y.S.2d 710 ; Mazzola v. Mazzola, 16 A.D.3d 629, 793 N.Y.S.2d 59 ). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The parties' remaining contentions have been rendered academic in light of our determination.

SKELOS, J.P., BALKIN, SGROI and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weisberg v. Town of Wallkill Boys & Girls Club, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 11, 2015
126 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Weisberg v. Town of Wallkill Boys & Girls Club, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Janine L. WEISBERG, appellant, v. TOWN OF WALLKILL BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 11, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 1940
2 N.Y.S.3d 802

Citing Cases

Mustafaj v. Macri

Landowners have a duty to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition under all of the…

Mugnai v. Town of Oyster Bay

The plaintiff appeals, and we affirm, albeit on a ground different from that relied upon by the court.The…