From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1985
112 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 8, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pino, J.).


Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

As this matter presents causes of action which seek damages only and do not affect the title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of the subject real property, the plaintiff corporation properly designated Kings County, its principal place of business, as the place of trial ( see, CPLR 503 [c]; cf. CPLR 507). Special Term correctly denied defendant's motion to change venue as defendant has failed to meet the criteria set forth in CPLR 510 which would authorize, permit or justify such a change. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Brown and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1985
112 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Case Details

Full title:WEINSTEIN ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent, v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Port Bay Assoc. v. Soundview Shopping Ctr.

Memorandum: In this landlord-tenant dispute concerning the interpretation of the payment terms of a lease,…

Peribanez v. Univ. Hill Apartments Inc.

This Court's review of case law on the issue of venue reveals that landlord-tenant disputes seeking only…