From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weining v. Sellitto

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 30, 1937
192 A. 233 (N.J. 1937)

Opinion

Submitted February term, 1937.

Decided April 30th, 1937.

On appeal from the court of chancery, whose opinion is reported in 121 N.J. Eq. 60.

Mr. John J. Clancy, for the appellants.

Mr. Harry Kay, for the respondents.


Our examination of the proofs taken in the court below convinces us that the order setting aside the decree pro confesso as against the infant Spenzierato, appointing a guardian and permitting an answer to be filed and awarding a counsel fee to the petitioner, was properly entered and it is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.

For reversal — PARKER, HEHER, JJ. 2.


Summaries of

Weining v. Sellitto

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 30, 1937
192 A. 233 (N.J. 1937)
Case details for

Weining v. Sellitto

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES WEINING, petitioner-appellant, v. GUISEPPE SELLITTO and THOMAS…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 30, 1937

Citations

192 A. 233 (N.J. 1937)
192 A. 233

Citing Cases

Wilkes v. Brennan

Instead he received and acted upon the exhibits and two ex parte affidavits in reporting and recommending the…

Springgarden Bldg. & Loan Ass'n of Nutley v. Fusaro

The acceptance of such proof by the master was erroneous. Bunting v. Bunting, 87 N.J.Eq. 20, 99 A. 840;…