From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wehle Electric Co. v. Kallock

Supreme Court, Special Term, Broome County
Apr 16, 1938
167 Misc. 598 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)

Opinion

April 16, 1938.

Lloyd C. Anderson [ N.W. Hankin of counsel], for the plaintiff.

Engelman Rosenberg, for the Belson Manufacturing Company.


Since rendering decision herein on March 31, 1938 ( 167 Misc. 596), it has been called to the court's attention for the first time that on August 6, 1937, an order was made at a Special Term of this court held in Broome county, directing that the lien of the Belson Manufacturing Company against William Kallock be, nunc pro tunc, continued for one year from February 13, 1937.

We rejected the lien of said defendant on the ground that it had not been renewed within one year, as required by the statute. This lien having been continued, nunc pro tunc, by an order not appealed from, set aside or modified, it should be and hereby is allowed. Our former decision is modified accordingly. ( Manton v. Brooklyn Flatbush Realty Co., 217 N.Y. 284; Dick Sand Co. v. State of New York, 137 Misc. 622, 625.)


Summaries of

Wehle Electric Co. v. Kallock

Supreme Court, Special Term, Broome County
Apr 16, 1938
167 Misc. 598 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)
Case details for

Wehle Electric Co. v. Kallock

Case Details

Full title:WEHLE ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM KALLOCK, BELSON…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Broome County

Date published: Apr 16, 1938

Citations

167 Misc. 598 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)
4 N.Y.S.2d 544

Citing Cases

Matter of American Bridge Co.

The pertinent change was with reference to the time the order was to be secured. That case is not an…

MATTER OF AM. BRIDGE CO.(LARSEN CO.).

The pertinent change was with reference to the time the order was to be secured. That case is not an…