From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weems v. Sterchi Brothers Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Dec 1, 1976
238 Ga. 77 (Ga. 1976)

Opinion

31666.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 9, 1976.

DECIDED DECEMBER 1, 1976.

Garnishment; constitutional question. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Ward.

David A. Webster, for appellant.


Sterchi filed an affidavit in garnishment after obtaining a judgment against Weems. Weems then filed a traverse to the affidavit in which she alleged that the post-judgment garnishment statute (Ga. L. 1976, p. 1608) was unconstitutional. The trial court overruled Weems' attack on the statute and she appeals.

The appellant makes the same attacks here as were made in City Finance Co. v. Winston, 238 Ga. 10 (1976). In that case it was held that portion of Ga. L. 1976, p. 1608, contained in Code Ann. §§ 46-102 and 46-103, was unconstitutional.

This court has held the post-judgment garnishment statute unconstitutional; therefore, the judgment of the trial court must be reversed.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Ingram and Hall, JJ., who dissent.


ARGUED NOVEMBER 9, 1976 — DECIDED DECEMBER 1, 1976.


Summaries of

Weems v. Sterchi Brothers Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Dec 1, 1976
238 Ga. 77 (Ga. 1976)
Case details for

Weems v. Sterchi Brothers Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WEEMS v. STERCHI BROTHERS STORES, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Dec 1, 1976

Citations

238 Ga. 77 (Ga. 1976)
231 S.E.2d 48

Citing Cases

Shepherd v. Shepherd

But in City Finance Co. v. Winston, 238 Ga. 10, 11 ( 231 S.E.2d 45), the Supreme Court again declared the…

Landmark Capital Invs., Inc. v. Nephrology

A traverse is a proper vehicle for the defense that Savannah Nephrology erects. See, e.g., Weems v. Sterchi…