From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weber v. Pnc Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Sep 11, 2015
2:13-cv-00298 TLN CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2015)

Opinion

          Andrew A. Bao, Meagan S. Tom, WOLFE & WYMAN LLP, Walnut Creek, California, Attorneys for Defendants, PNC BANK, N.A. and HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2 (sued erroneously as "HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.).

          MOLSBY & BORDNER, LLP, ROBIN D. SHOFNER, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINES

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 16(b)(4) and the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Local Civil Rule 83-143, Defendants PNC BANK, N.A. ("PNC") and HSBC BANK U.S.A., N.A., as Trustee for Luminent Mortgage Trust 2007-2 (sued erroneously as "HSBC BANK, U.S.A., N.A.) ("HSBC") and Plaintiff THOMAS A. WEBER ("Plaintiff") (collectively, the "Parties") herein stipulate for a continuance of discovery deadlines in the above-referenced action.

         RECITALS

         1. Trial in this matter is currently set for October 17, 2016, and the last day to complete discovery is November 5, 2015.

         2. The Parties agree that a continuance of the discovery cutoff date in the best interest of justice of all parties because:

         A. The Parties continue to explore potential settlement options following the death of Plaintiff Belinda Weber, including but not limited to, a loan modification review;

         B. However, the Parties require additional time in order to submit a loan modification application and to review said loan modification application;

         C. There are currently no other parties involved in this litigation, and thus no parties will be prejudiced by the terms of this stipulation;

         D. The Parties had previously requested a trial continuance on July 22, 2014, at which time the pleadings were not at issue and contained new allegations and claims, necessitating additional time to conduct discovery.

         E. The Court had previously granted the trial continuance, and set the new trial for October 17, 2016. This stipulation does not continue the trial date, or any other trial-related deadlines besides the discovery deadlines.

         3. Thus, good cause exists for a continuance of the discovery deadlines in this action.

         4. Whereas, the Parties request a continuance of the following deadlines:

February 5, 2016 Last Day to Complete Discovery and;

March 5, 2016 Last Day for Disclosure of Expert Witness

         NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERE STIPULATE TO THE FOREGOING, subject to this Court's approval.

          ORDER

         The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Discovery Deadlines, and good cause appearing therefore, makes the following Order:

         The discovery deadline date is continued from November 5, 2015 to February 5, 2016.

         The disclosure of expert witness deadline date is continued from January 7, 2016 to March 4, 2016.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Weber v. Pnc Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Sep 11, 2015
2:13-cv-00298 TLN CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Weber v. Pnc Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS A. WEBER and BELINDA G. WEBER, Plaintiffs, v. PNC BANK, N.A.; HSBC…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Sep 11, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-00298 TLN CKD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2015)