From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weber v. Harbus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff Michael Weber failed to establish that he had sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The only medical evidence submitted by the plaintiffs was an affidavit of Michael Weber's treating physician which was conclusory in nature, did not specify any quantifiable limitation of Weber's abilities, was based merely upon Weber's subjective complaints of pain, and was clearly tailored to meet the statutory requirements (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956-957; Lopez v. Senatore, 65 N.Y.2d 1017, 1019; Stallone v County of Suffolk, 209 A.D.2d 403; DuMont v. Sandhir, 201 A.D.2d 450; McHaffie v. Antieri, 190 A.D.2d 780). Thus, the affidavit was insufficient to defeat the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weber v. Harbus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1995
212 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Weber v. Harbus

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WEBER et al., Respondents, v. ARNOLD HARBUS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 122

Citing Cases

GUSZ v. RIDDICK

Georgia v. Ramautar, 180 AD2d 713 (2nd Dept. 1992); Mobley v. Riportella, 241 AD2d 443 (2nd Dept. 1997). A…