From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wear v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 2, 2014
No. 03:12-cv-2025-SU (D. Or. Jan. 2, 2014)

Opinion

No. 03:12-cv-2025-SU

01-02-2014

KATRINA ROSANNE WEAR, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#16) on November 6, 2013, in which she recommends that this Court reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand the case for additional proceedings. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation [16]. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded for additional proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wear v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 2, 2014
No. 03:12-cv-2025-SU (D. Or. Jan. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Wear v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:KATRINA ROSANNE WEAR, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 2, 2014

Citations

No. 03:12-cv-2025-SU (D. Or. Jan. 2, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wear v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.

This is precisely the error the ALJ made in his previous decision, which formed the basis for this Court to…