From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wayne v. Freeport Motor Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 10, 1946
329 Ill. App. 185 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

Summary

In Wayne v. Freeport Motor Casualty Co., 329 Ill. App. 185 (abst.) the court said: "There is no invariable rule that we will not reverse a second time for the reason that a verdict is manifestly against the evidence."

Summary of this case from Novak v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,715. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 10, 1946 Released for publication July 1, 1946

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 66.1when verdict on automobile indemnity policy was not against manifest weight of evidence. In action against insurance company, commenced when judgment against holder of indemnity policy, in action alleging negligence of driver of his automobile resulted in injuries to plaintiff, remained unsatisfied, where defendant contended that it was not notified by assured of such action and therefore was not liable to plaintiff, and it appeared that witness for plaintiff testified that he handed summons to employee of insurance company and was told it would be taken care of, which was denied by defendant, held that since issue of fact was peculiarly for jury, verdict for plaintiff was not against manifest weight of evidence.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. THOMAS J. COURTNEY, Judge, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the April term, 1946.

Eckert Peterson, for appellant;

Burt A. Crowe and Carl E. Abrahamson, of counsel;

Joseph F. Elward, for appellee;

Philip Conley, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed June 10, 1946; released for publication July 1, 1946.


Summaries of

Wayne v. Freeport Motor Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 10, 1946
329 Ill. App. 185 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

In Wayne v. Freeport Motor Casualty Co., 329 Ill. App. 185 (abst.) the court said: "There is no invariable rule that we will not reverse a second time for the reason that a verdict is manifestly against the evidence."

Summary of this case from Novak v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
Case details for

Wayne v. Freeport Motor Casualty Co.

Case Details

Full title:Ruth Schikora Wayne, Appellee, v. Freeport Motor Casualty Company…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 10, 1946

Citations

329 Ill. App. 185 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
67 N.E.2d 425

Citing Cases

Warren v. Patton

However, it will be presumed that the trial judge was aware of the two verdicts and gave them consideration;…

Novak v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.

Plaintiffs assert that it is a well established rule of law that where a case has been twice tried and two…