finding that plaintiff failed to state an Eighth Amendment claim where he was housed in a lighted cell for three weeks and failed to allege that he lost sleep or was otherwise harmed
Summary of this case from Dalenko v. Stephens99-2350.
October 27, 1999.
Appeal from S.D.Ind.
Affirmed
finding that plaintiff failed to state an Eighth Amendment claim where he was housed in a lighted cell for three weeks and failed to allege that he lost sleep or was otherwise harmed
Summary of this case from Dalenko v. Stephensdiscussing inmate's complaint about the constant illumination of his cell and recognizing that other circuits “have focused on whether the constant light deprived the inmate of sleep or caused mental or psychological problems”
Summary of this case from Ames v. RandleFull title:Watts v. Network Solutions, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Date published: Oct 27, 1999
To determine whether another state has a materially greater interest in the subject matter of the litigation,…
Name.Space, Inc. v. Network Solutions, Inc.Otter Tail, however, is clearly distinguishable from the case at hand; it involved a lawsuit commenced by the…