From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watterman v. Falk

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 13, 1958
11 Misc. 2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

March 13, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, OLIVER D. WILLIAMS, J.

Abraham M. Feinstein and Julius Siegel for appellants.

Murray Rosof for respondents.


Upon the expiration of the original term, the landlords were required to elect whether to treat the tenants as trespassers or as tenants from year to year ( Kennedy v. City of New York, 196 N.Y. 19). They permitted the tenants to remain in possession and accepted rent for the next four months at the rate stipulated in the lease. Absent proof of any other understanding between the parties, it must be presumed that the lease was renewed for another year at the same terms. (See Cole v. Sanford, 77 Hun 198, and cases there cited.)

Final order unanimously modified on the law and facts by reducing landlords' recovery for rent to $125 for the month commencing November 1, 1957, together with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified, affirmed, with $25 costs of this appeal to the tenants.

PETTE, HART and DI GIOVANNA, JJ., concur.

Final order modified, etc.


Summaries of

Watterman v. Falk

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Mar 13, 1958
11 Misc. 2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Watterman v. Falk

Case Details

Full title:DORA WATTERMAN et al., Respondents, v. DAVID FALK et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1958

Citations

11 Misc. 2d 1074 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
174 N.Y.S.2d 88

Citing Cases

Pinto Photography v. Sheppard

The waiver rule, when relied upon by the landlord, is consistent with the common-law rule that a "tenant…

ZOLA v. HAVIVI

In short, when an expired lease covers a term of over one year, the duration of the holding over will be for…