From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Duryea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1909
133 App. Div. 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Opinion

June 4, 1909.

Robert W. Kristeller, for the appellant.

Edward A. Alexander and Jerome H. Buck, for the respondent.


This appeal should be dismissed. The Municipal Court Act does not seem in express words to authorize the entry of an interlocutory judgment upon demurrer. ( Great Northern Moulding Co. v. Bonewur, No. 1, 128 App. Div. 101.) In this case no interlocutory judgment was entered, as appears from the return. An appeal from the order will not lie. ( Fink v. Standard Bread Co., 110 N.Y. Supp. 205; Smith v. Ely, 46 Misc. Rep. 458; Binder v. Robinson, 59 id. 155.)

The appeal must be dismissed, with costs.

WOODWARD, JENKS, GAYNOR and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.


Summaries of

Watson v. Duryea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1909
133 App. Div. 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Case details for

Watson v. Duryea

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD D. WATSON, Appellant, v . FRANKLIN P. DURYEA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1909

Citations

133 App. Div. 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
117 N.Y.S. 348

Citing Cases

Pratt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

The demurrers should, therefore, have been overruled; but judgment has not been entered thereon, and the…