From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Andrews

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 17, 2021
3:20-cv-00729-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2021)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00729-FDW

08-17-2021

DAVID EARL WATSON, Petitioner, v. J. ANDREWS, Respondent.


ORDER

Frank D. Whitney United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on transfer of Petitioner's “2241 Petitioner for Writ of Habeas Corpus” back to this District from the Eastern District of Virginia, Case No. 1:21-cv-00013 (“Va.”). [See Docs. 1, 7].

On March 1, 2019, Petitioner pleaded guilty in this Court to one count of RICO conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(d) and 1963(a). [Criminal Case No. 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-DSC (“CR”), CR Doc. 2452: Plea Agreement; CR Doc. 2459: Acceptance and Entry of Guilty Plea]. On November 21, 2019, this Court sentenced Petitioner to a term of imprisonment of 41 months. [CR Doc. 2777: Judgment]. On December 28, 2020, Petitioner filed the instant petition, which he titled “2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” [Doc. 1]. Petitioner, in part, purported “to challenge the way the sentence is carried out” and asked the Court “to consider this Habeas Petition in conjunction with the Covid-19 Compassionate Release initiative.” [Id. at 1]. Petitioner is confined at PETERSBURG Low Federal Correctional Institution, which is in the Eastern District of Virginia. To the extent Petitioner is seeking relief under § 2241 and because any such petition would have been properly filed in the Eastern District of Virginia, this Court transferred the petition to that court. See United States v. Vance, 563 Fed. App'x 277, 278 (4th Cir. 2014) (“A prisoner wishing to challenge the BOP's computation or execution of a federal sentence may do so via a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . . . in the district of his confinement following exhaustion of available administrative remedies.”). Because, however, Petitioner also purported to seek release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) in his criminal proceedings in this Court, the Court directed the Clerk to docket the instant petition [Doc. 1] in Criminal Case No. 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-DSC-79. [Doc. 2; see CR Doc. 3075]. Rather than address Petitioner's motion to the extent Petitioner seeks relief pursuant to § 2241, however, the Honorable Judge Trenga transferred the action back to the undersigned in this District. [Va. Doc. 7]. This Court will, therefore, dismiss Petitioner's petition for relief pursuant to § 2241. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

Petitioner's motion for compassionate release remains pending in his criminal proceedings in this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs Petition [Doc. 1] is DISMISSED.
2. The Clerk is instructed to terminate this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Watson v. Andrews

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 17, 2021
3:20-cv-00729-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Watson v. Andrews

Case Details

Full title:DAVID EARL WATSON, Petitioner, v. J. ANDREWS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Aug 17, 2021

Citations

3:20-cv-00729-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2021)