From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watmuff v. Perini

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 30, 1969
249 N.E.2d 887 (Ohio 1969)

Opinion

No. 69-209

Decided July 30, 1969.

Criminal law — Sentence begins to run, when — Habeas corpus.

IN HABEAS CORPUS.

Mr. Richard J. Watmuff, in propria persona. Mr. Paul W. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. James S. Rood, for respondent.


This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court.

Pursuant to a plea of guilty, petitioner, on March 13, 1963, was sentenced to a term of two to seven years for malicious entry and aggravated assault.

Petitioner does not attack the validity of his conviction or his sentence. His only contention is that his sentence began to run on the day it was imposed rather than some four days later when he was received at the penal institution.

Ordinarily, a sentence begins to run when the convicted person is delivered to the penal institution. 24B Corpus Juris Secundum 634, Criminal Law, Section 1995(2).

Petitioner remanded to custody.

TAFT, C.J., MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, SCHNEIDER, HERBERT and DUNCAN, JJ., concur.

This decision was made after the death of JUSTICE ZIMMERMAN and before the appointment of a successor.


Summaries of

Watmuff v. Perini

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 30, 1969
249 N.E.2d 887 (Ohio 1969)
Case details for

Watmuff v. Perini

Case Details

Full title:WATMUFF v. PERINI, SUPT., MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 30, 1969

Citations

249 N.E.2d 887 (Ohio 1969)
249 N.E.2d 887

Citing Cases

State v. Edwards

There are cases holding that a sentence does not begin to run immediately upon imposition of the sentence but…